BETWEEN PAST AND PRESENT, STANDARDS AND PRACTICES, THE WORK OF THE PEDAGOGICAL COORDINATOR IN CHILDHOOD EDUCATION IN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT
Pedagogical Coordination; Pedagogical practices; Child education; Role of pedagogical coordination in Brasilia
This dissertation aims to analyze the role of pedagogical coordination in public schools in the Federal District, based on the normative framework and pedagogical practices in the Early Childhood Education Centers and Kindergartens of the State Department of Education of the Federal District. For this purpose, the times and spaces where the pedagogical coordinators work are taken into account with further follow-up procedures in the Early Childhood Education Centers and Kindergartens of the State Department of Education of the Federal District (SEEDF). The proposed route was to relate what is currently established by SEEDF and the work that is carried out by the coordinator. The theoretical foundation is based on the legislation that defined the coordination throughout the history of Brasilia until the present day, with the annual ordinances published to establish coordination norms, as well as articles in Correio Braziliense- a newspaper from Brasília, the Regiment of the Public Teaching Network of the Federal District (SEEDF, 2019) and the Pedagogical Guidelines (SEEDF, 2014). The present study dialogues with Almeida (2001, 2010), Vasconcellos (2019), Alcântara (2020), Nóvoa (2015), Tardif (2014), among others in its theoretical basis. This is a study with a qualitative approach, which permeates bibliographical research (with a literature review of theses and dissertations); document research (in the Official Gazette of the Federal District and Jornal Correio Braziliense); field survey (with observation, questionnaire and interview); action research (with the intervention materialized in the technical product). Data from field reseach point to practices apparently integrated with the SEEDF guidelines and the Early Childhood Education Curriculum in Motion (DF, 2018), but without due reflection and without understanding the reasons for such practices. It also shows that the guidelines are not so clear and that there is a lack of subsidies to carry out the attributions of the pedagogical coordinator.